Category: Ann - Part 22

No Celts in Ancient China

Every now and then a news story comes to light about the so-called Celtic mummies of China. The story has been making rounds for most of this century, from scientific conferences to ABCNews. Without detracting from the wonder that is the Cherchen mummies, lets set the record straight concerning the Celticness of these men and women” writes Emma Wohlfart on her blog PastPresenters. What arguments does she offer and err.. were we mistaken too?

Emma – who introduces herself as a twenty-something writer with an archaeology degree, a laptop and a maxed out library card – agrees that there were Bronze Age contacts between Europeans and the Chinese, but wants to get the message across, preferably once and for all, that they were not Celtic:

  • The ‘Xinjiang Europeans’ had all died by the time anyone was referred to as a Celt.
  • Icons found with the bodies which resembled in some ways the Sheela na Gig figure are no sign of Celticness. The Sheela na Gigs we know from Ireland are 2400 years younger and occure all across Europe.
  • The standing stones surrounding the burial was linked to the British dolmens, but these belong to the Stone Age and predate Celtic culture by thousands of years and exist in Asia too.
  • DNA findings were that the mummies shared DNA with, amongst others, modern Swedes, Finns, and Italians, neither of which are particularly Celtic.

After Emma has convinced you that the Celts never got quite as far as China, you can quickly learn more about the these fascinating ancient peoples of Europe by listening to the Sixty Second Celtic Chronicle podcast series on Emma’s YouTube Channel, starting at the introduction, of course.

Archaeology and the Bible? It’s Stones and Stories

Stones and Stories, an Introduction to Archaeology and the Bible by Don C BenjaminCombining religion and science is impossible unless you’re willing to get err… creative? Not quite true: although they might quarrel about the details, archaeologists and the scriptures do quite agree on major historical facts such as the destruction of Jericho, the rule of Herod the Great as well as King David’s. Archaeology can help determine the lifestyle and practices of people living in biblical times and such shed light upon the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament. The biblical archaeology school focusses on doing exactly this, and Professor Don Benjamin in his book ‘Stones and Stories: An Introduction to Archaeology and the Bible‘ presents an overview of what archaeology has shown us regarding the worlds of the Bible. From the introduction of the book:

Archaeology is not the plunder of the treasures of ancient cultures, nor proving that the Bibles descriptions of people and events are historically accurate, nor a legal remedy for determining which people today have a legal right to the land.

Archaeology in the world of the Bible does not prove the Bible wrong, anymore than biblical archaeology proves the Bible right. Archaeology offers new ways of defining the Bible in relationship with its own world, and using it more effectively in the world today. Archaeology provides different perspectives on the way the people of ancient Israel responded to their experiences, and consequently provides models for responding differently to experience today.

Culture is the tool that humans use to understand and respond to their experiences good and bad. Every stone tells a story about how a now gone people looked at their world, and responded to their experiences. Archaeologists are the curators of this amazing legacy.

The book describes how archaeologists listen to the stories that stones – like architecture, art, pottery, jewellery, weapons and tools – have to tell, what they are hearing, and what a difference it makes for understanding the Bible. In his introduction Don Benjamin also teaches about both the ‘minimalistic’ and ‘maximalistic’ approaches to how much ‘historical truth’ the Bible holds, touches on practical examples from the field such as the excavations at Qumran and clearly sketches the history and current practices of the biblical archaeology school as well as makes predictions for the future of biblical archaeology.

Biblical scholar Jim West has a great review of the book and on his website doncbenjamin.com the Professor offers a some large excerpts from the publication, for those who of you who want to sample before they buy.

Ancient Egypt Lego Models and Plastic Pyramid Builders

While Heritage Key’s virtual engineers and construction team are still building away on our Nile Villa – a virtual, avatar-accessible reconstruction of an ancient Egyptian villa from the city of Akhetaten, Amarna – Flickr user Higdon took a more physical approach, and resurrected an ancient Egyptian nobleman’s villa using Lego blocks.

Ancient Egyptian villa constructed out of Lego Blocks
IMGP6481, originally uploaded by d-higdon.

We’ve already encountered Legohenge – a Stonehenge build with Lego blocks, protesting druids included – in our Top 10 Stonehenge Replicas, there is an official ‘Lego Egyptian Mummy’ on sale (1183 in the Adventurers Egypt series) as well as a ‘Treasure Tomb’ (3722), a ‘Mummy’s Tomb’ (5958) and the ‘Pharaoh’s Forbidden Ruins’ (5988), and of course there was also the Vancouver’s Science Museum World Egyptian Lego exhibit, with Lego-based pyramid builders (going for the external ramp theory?), King Tut’s mask, an entire Egyptian tomb made out of Lego and – my personal favourite – the Lego mummification process:

Mummification process depictedin Lego Blocks
Lego Mummification 1, originally uploaded by mhchipmunk.

And if you’re not convinced yet of the Greatness of Lego, this was their promotion for the Adventurers Egypt series, which reminds of the upcoming theft of the Great Pyramid in animation movie Despicable Me:

The Egypt Exploration Society’s Flickr Treasures

Browsing through Flickr sometimes feels like a treasure hunt. I’ll never be disappointed – great photographs get uploaded to it daily – but once in a while you find that really Astonishing Photograph, especially since more and organisations started making their archives available to the public through the Commons and private Flickr streams. Today was one of those ‘Wow!’ days, as I discovered the Flickr stream of the Egypt Exploration Society – as the EEShas been working in Egypt since 1882 – filled with marvelous photographs from ‘ancient times’. My 5 favourites from the ‘the early days of Egyptology’:

Ahnas Prints – ‘Types of Mummy-cases’

Ahnas Prints 005

The excavations by the Egypt Exploration Society – then still known as the ‘Egypt Exploration Fund’ – at Ahnas were conducted by Edouard Naville in 1891 to 1892. Some of the coffins are currently UK museums while others were reburied on the site. But the cemeteries proved not to be as rich as Naville might have hoped: “Finding that the necropolis gave so little result, and that there was nothing belonging to older epochs, we left the desert, and went over to the mounds of Henassieh All over the mounds, scattered blocks of red granite show that there must have been some construction of importance.”

The Royal Tomb of Akhenaten at Amarna

TART_34-35_No26_Film_0057TART_34-35_No26_Film_0056

The Royal Tomb at Amarna – also known as the Royal Wadi – was discovered in 1891 by archaeologist Alessandro Barsanti and was ment for the burial of Akhenaten as well as that of multiple members of his family. Taken during the Society’s work at the royal tomb during the 1934-1935 season, these photographs capture exactly how I- and I trust I’m not alone in this – imagine a ‘tomb opening’ to look like. (Yes, I know, these photographs from the opening, but still…!)

Howard Carter overlooking excavations at Deir el Bahri

Deir el Bahri, Excavations in progress, 1893

Howard Carter is seen here supervising a group of workmen moving material cleared from the temple site in one of the Decauville cars which Naville borrowed from the Service des Antiquities along with 460 metres of tramway. This photograph was taken in 1893, during excavations at Deir el Bahri.

Pay-day at Balabish

Pay-day at Balabish

Andrew Bednarski in ‘The EES:the early years’ says about this photograph: “This view of pay-day at Balabish is typical of scenes on excavations in Egypt until fairly recent times. The director, Gerald Wainwright, sits behind a table with the workmen gathered before and around him, waiting to be paid. Most of the workmen have the tools of their trade, the hoe and basket, and wear traditional Egyptian dress, in contrast to the rather formal western clothes (including a tie) of Wainwright.”

JDSPendlebury at Amarna

J D S Pendlebury

John (Devitt Stringfellow) Pendlebury was one of the most famous early 20th century archaeologists. Being unable to decide to go for Egyptian or Greek archaeology, he started studying Egyptian artifacts found in Greece. Later, he managed – thanks to the temperature difference between Greece and Egypt – to excavate in both countries simultaneously. Pendlebury started excavating at Amarna in 1929, and later became Director of Excavations there. Pendlebury died during WWII – he was in his late thirties – from a gunshot wound to the chest.

For more photographs from the archives, check out the EES’s Flickr stream. You can also keep an eye on their Tumblr Blog, as well as become a fan of the Society on Facebook. If you’re fascinated by archive photographs from the ancient world (or at least enjoyed my 5 favourites listed here), you definitely want to have a look at the our selection from the Cornell University Library’s Flickr stream as well!

Computer Helps Decode Harappan Grammar

harappan sealsSome scholars consider the ancient Harappan pictograms of the Indus Valley in South Asia to be random. Not so, says Rajesh Rao of the University of Washington. He calculated the conditional entropy – a measure of randomness – of the script and found that it is most likely a language. Next, Rao will analyze the texts structure using simple statistical software.

The ancient twin cities of the Indus Valley – Harappa and Mohenjo-daro – are part of one of the oldest civilizations known to man. They were huge metropolises holding over 30,000 people each. A series of symbols dating to around 2,500 BC has also been found in the area, yet historians are still unable to draw any meaning from them which could be construed as symbolic of an alphabet in the area.

Recent evidence suggests that the fertile Indus River basin could have been home to an empire larger and older than its more famous contemporaries in the Middle East, and thus be one of the cradles of civilisation. Up to now excavations in the Indus River Valley have provided us with roughly 5,000 seals, tablets and amulets, filled with about 500 different symbols, all created somewhere between 2600 and 1900 BC. But what do these tell us?

Rao imagines he could write in “flawless Harappan”, even though he may have no idea what the assembled sequences might mean.

Despite numerous attempts to decipher the symbols – known as Harappan script – a full translation has long eluded scientists. Some archaeologists think to have found paralles with the cuneiform of Mesopotamia; others speculate an unlikely link between Harappan signs and the birdmen glyphs found thousands of miles away in the Pacific Ocean at Easter Island.

A 2004 paper even suggested that the Indus Valley people were functionally illiterate and the Harappan symbols were political or religious symbols rather than writing.

To start the search for what meaning the text might hold, American and Indian mathematicians and computer scientists input the symbols into a computer program and then ran a statistical analysis of the symbols and where they appear in the texts. Time.com explains:

The group examined hundreds of Harappan texts and tested their structure against other known languages using a computer program. Every language, they suggest, possesses what is known as “conditional entropy”: the degree of randomness in a given sequence. In English, for example, the letter “t” can be found preceding a whole variety of other letters, but instances of “tx” or “tz” are far more infrequent than “th” or “ta.” “A written language comes about through this mix of built-in rules and flexible variables,” says Mayank Vahia, an astrophysicist at the Tata Institute for Fundamental Research in Mumbai who worked on the study. Quantifying this principle through computer probability tests, they determined the Harappan script had a similar measure of conditional entropy to other writing systems, including English, Sanskrit and Sumerian. If it mathematically looked and acted like writing, they concluded, then surely it is writing.

Voynich Manuscript - Wikipedia CommonsThis is just the beginning of ‘deciphering’ the Harappan symbols. The international team hopes to compose a grammar of Indus signs, as they’ve already found that certain placements of characters in the text to be more likely: a “fish” sign most frequently appeared in the middle of a sequence, a U-shaped “jar” sign toward the end.

There are some who say the Indus Valley script can never be deciphered without a bilingual text like the Rosetta Stone or really long texts, but Rao is optimistic that given a few more years, the team may be able to at least narrow down the language family of the script by using computer analysis to gain an in-depth understanding of the underlying grammar.

With the help of the software, Rajesh Rao, associate professor of computer science at the University of Washington imagines he could write in “flawless Harappan” – even though he may have no idea what the assembled sequences might mean.

Marcelo Montemurro, a scientist at the University of Manchester now wants to test the software on the up to know undecipherable medieval text known as the Voynich manuscript: “The text is not long, but these methods can be applied so we can at least obtain a list of special words that would presumably convey the overall meaning of the texts.”

With – amongst others – Proto-Elamite, Linear-A and Olmec still to go, the team won’t run out of Ancient Scripts to decipher anywhere soon! Luckily computing power gives modern-day scientists a huge advantage over their predecessors: not only for ‘breaking the code’ on mysterious ancient languages, but also in making documents thought long-time lost readable again.

The Replica Valley of the Kings – King Tut Gets Another Tomb

Recently the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities has shared it’s worries about the future of the tombs in the Valley of the Kings with the world. Now they share more details on the planned solutions: ventilation systems, special lighting and… well, we expected a replica of KV62, but we’re getting an entire new Valley of the Kings on the cliff side of the real one.

Daily thousands of tourists visit the tombs of King Tut, Seti I, Ramses, Horemeb (recently re-opened) and Queen Nefertari. All well, were it not that the quantity of humidity and fungus generated through breath and sweat is gradually eroding the soft stone of the chambers, slowly destroying paintings and carvings thousands of years old. Dr Hawass has now confirmed that closing Tutankhamun, Nefertari and Seti I’s tombs is the first step in the new plan to protect the Valley of the Kings. Others will get added protection.

As a first step, the SCA is currently installing a cool lighting system in the Valley of the Kings so that people can visit the tombs in the evening. This will help protect the paintings as it will spread the number of visits over the course of the day. “It will also allow the tombs to escape from the extra head and moisture that builds up in them throughout the day,” Dr. Hawass said.

Some of the "unfinished" walls in Tomb of Horemheb (KV57)Dr. Hawass tells Al-Ahram that 13 royal tombs – out of a total of 63 – in the Valley of the Kings were open but no one visits them. Once the most popular tombs are closed tourists will be more encouraged to visit the others. The original tombs can still be entered, but at a price. “Whoever wants to visit the original tombs of Tutankhamun, Seti I and Nefertari must pay a huge amount of money,” Hawass says.

As for the tombs of Tutankhamun, Seti I and Nefertari, Hawass said a plan to protect them was now being implemented in collaboration with the British organisation Adam Lowe of Factun Arte. The plan is to create identical replicas of these tombs by making detailed high-resolution copies of the burial chambers, paintings and sarcophagi using laser scanners. After the replicas have been constructed they will be installed on the cliff side of the Valley of the Kings, which will be called “The Replica Valley” where visitors can experience their beauty with the knowledge that the ancient paintings are being preserved. Hawass pointed out that missing fragments from these tombs now held in foreign museum, would also be scanned and added to the overall reconstruction to give a complete picture of the tombs. (Nevine El-Aref for Al-Ahram)

Starting next month tour guides will not be allowed to enter with their groups into the tombs at Beni Hassan in Minya, Giza and Saqqara. A model will be installed at the entrance of each tomb. While you wait for The Replica Valley to be completed, you can still check out our replica KV62 – based on superb photographs of the wall paintings by Sandro Vannini – and Tutankhamun’s treasures by getting yourself an avatar and exploring King Tut Virtual.

Biological Weapons and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World

Ancient weapons of mass destructionIn 1972, the U.S. signed the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention, which banned the “development, production and stockpiling of microbes or their poisonous products except in amounts necessary for protective and peaceful research.” By 1996, 137 countries had signed the treaty. But was this this the first attempt at establishing rules for ‘humane warfare’? No, antiquity beat us to it, although they – also – often did not adhere to their own rules. The Brahmanic Laws of Manu, a Hindu treatise on statecraft dating back to the 5th Century BC, forbids the use of arrows tipped with fire or poison, but advises poisoning food and water. Kautilya’s Arthashastra, one of the world’s earliest treatises on war, advocates surprise night raids and offers recipes for toxic smokes and plague-generating toxins, but it also urges princes to exercise restraint and win the hearts and minds of their foes. The Roman historian Florus denounced sabotaging an enemy’s water supply, saying the act “violated the laws of heaven and the practice of our forefathers.”

Even in antiquity, many feared the lurking consequences of unleashing what we now call chemical weapons – indeed, the ancient Greek tale of Pandora’s box offers a continuing metaphor for their use. This lack of ‘war ethics’ lead to quite a few interesting occurrences of biological as well as chemical warfare, and shows us that nearly every advanced biochemical weapon today has an ancient prototype.

Biological Warfare in Antiquity

The Hittite Plague (1320 BC) – The earliest documented case of biological warfare in the Near East was during the Anatolian War when the Hittites, even though militarily weaker than their enemies the Arzawans, won victory with a secret bioweapon. They drove rams and donkeys infected with deadly tularemia into Arzawan lands. The lethal plague was transmitted to humans via ticks and flies. Today, artificially manufactured plague germs are possible, a concept first described by ancient Romans as pestilentia manu facta, man-made pestilence.

Armis Bella Non Venenis Geri. (War is fought with weapons, not with poisons.) – A Roman Lawyer

Mad Cow (10th Century BD) – A witch named Chrysame was the worlds first military commander who was also adept in pharmacology. who used drugs to cause temporary insanity in the enemy, during the Greek colonization of Ionia in about 1000 BC. Polyaenus in his Stratagems tells us: “Possessing great skill in the occult qualities of herbs, she chose out of the herd a large and beautiful bull, gilded his horns, and decorated him with garlands, and purple ribbons embroidered with gold. She mixed in his fodder a medicinal herb that would excite madness, and ordered him to be kept in the stall and fed upon it. The efficacy of this medicine was such, that not only the beast, who ate it, was seized with madness; but also all, who ate the flesh of it, when it was in such a state, were seized with the same insanity. When the enemy encamped against her, she directed an altar to be raised in sight of them; and after every preparation for a sacrifice had been made, the bull was brought forth. Under the influence of the medicine, the bull broke loose; he ran wild into the plain, roaring, and tilting at everything he met. The Erythraeans saw the victim, intended for the enemy’s sacrifice, running towards their camp, and considered it as a happy omen. They seized the beast, and offered him up in sacrifice to their gods; everyone, in participation of the sacrifice, ate a piece of the flesh. The whole army was soon afterwards seized with madness, and exhibited the same marks of wildness and frenzy the bull had done.”

No Chance at Recovery (4th Century BC) – Scythian archers tipped their arrow tips with snake venom, human blood, and animal feces to cause wounds to become infected. There are numerous other instances of the use of plant toxins, venoms, and other poisonous substances to create biological weapons in antiquity. (And of course, man used toxic arrows already way earlier to hunt for large game.)

venomBombs, Snakes and Scorpions Away (184 BC) – Hannibal of Carthage had clay pots filled with venomous snakes and instructed his soldiers to throw the pots onto the decks of Pergamene ships. And in about AD 198, the city of Hatra repulsed the Roman army led by Septimius Severus by hurling clay pots filled with live scorpions at them.

Send in the Bees! (1st Century BC) – At Themiscyra, a stubborn Greek outpost, Romans tunneling beneath the city contended with not only a charge of wild beasts but also a barrage of hives swarming with bees. A rather direct approach to biological warfare?

Send in the Bees II (67 BC) – Pompey was leading a campaign against Mithridates, the king of Pontus. As his troops passed along the roads in the Trebizond region (Turkey), the people of the region, the Heptakometes, put out honey as tribute. The honey was a local product, and it contained acetylandromedol, a grayanotoxin (as the bees visited the local rhododendron species). This toxin produced nausea and hallucinations, and perhaps some deaths, among the troops who consumed it, and three maniples of the Roman army were attacked and destroyed while intoxicated. The Roman commanders should have studied their classics more closely – Xenophon, in his Anabasis, tells of what happened when his troops consumed some of the local honeycomb in the same area in 401 BC – although he was luckier than Pompey, as the Persians who were pursuing him did not attack during the four days his army took to recover.

And last but not least, and not entirely ancient but definitely worth mentioning due to the catastrophic consequences for both friend and foe. Was the bubonic plague the first ‘weapon of mass destruction’?

Tartar army accountable for the Black Death? (1346 AD) – The Mongol army in 1346 launched a biological assault that may have gotten out of control – big time. While besieging the city of Kaffa (modern-day Crimea), soldiers hurled their own corpses of bubonic plague victims over city walls. Fleas from the corpses infested people and rats in the city. Plague spread as people and rats escaped and fled. Some experts believe the refugees from Kaffa travelling to Constantinople, Genoa, and Venice triggered the great epidemic of bubonic plague – the “Black Death” – that swept Europe three years later, killing 25 million people.

Chemical Warfare in the Ancient Times

Soul-Hunting Fog (10th Century BC) – The Chinese were the original masters of chemical warfar: Chinese writings contain literally hundreds of recipes for the production of poisonous or irritating smokes for use in war, and many accounts of their use. Thus we know of the arsenic-containing “soul-hunting fog” and the irritating “five-league fog” (formed from a slow-burning gunpowder to which a variety of ingredients, including the excrement of wolves, was added to produce an irritating smoke).

Black Hellebore Study 1Is Your Army Potty-trained? (6th Century BC) – Lead by Solon of Athens, the ancient Greeks, besieging a city called Krissa, poisoned the water in an aqueduct leading from the Pleistrus River with the herb hellebore: it causes violent diarrhea.

The Earliest Recorded Use of Gas Warfare in the West (5th Century BC) – During the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, Spartan forces besieging an Athenian city placed a lighted mixture of wood, pitch, and sulfur under the walls hoping that the noxious smoke would incapacitate the Athenians, so that they would not be able to resist the assault that followed.

Burning Bombardment (332 BC) – The citizens of the doomed port of Tyre catapulted basins of burning sand at Alexander the Great‘s advancing army. Falling from the sky, the sand would have had the same ghastly effect as white phosphorus.

Smoke Them Romans Out (187 BC) – The inhabitants of the town of Ambracia in Epirus dealt a setback to Roman soldiers seeking to tunnel under their walls: “Filling a huge jar with feathers, they put fire in it and attached a bronze cover perforated with numerous holes. After carrying the jar into the mine and turning its mouth toward the enemy, they inserted a bellows in the bottom, and by pumping the bellows vigorously they caused a tremendous amount of disagreeable smoke, such as feathers would naturally create, to pour forth, so that none of the Romans could endure it. As a result the Romans, despairing of success, made a truce and raised the siege.” (Cassius Dio, Roman History, Book XIX)

Close Your Eyes and Pray (80 BC)– According to the historian Plutarch, the Roman general Sertorius had his troops pile mounds of gypsum powder by the hillside hideaways of Spanish rebels. When kicked up by a strong northerly wind, the dust became a severe irritant, smoking the insurgents out of their caves.

Early Riot Control (178 AD) – A Chinese ruler put down a peasant revolt by encircling the rebels with chariots heaped with limestone powder. The charioteers pumped the powder into a primitive tear gas even more corrosive and lethal than its modern equivalent. The peasants didn’t stand a chance.

Sulfur and Bitumen gas fatal for Roman Sapeurs (256 AD) – During the final siege of the city Dura-Europos (Syria), the attackers burrowed beneath the walls in order to breach the Roman defenses; the Romans heard this and started digging a countermine to fend off the assault. But the Persians prepared a nasty surprise, pumping lethal fumes from a brazier burning sulfur crystals and bitumen, a tarlike substance, with bellows into the Roman tunnels. It was concluded that 20 Roman soldiers unearthed beneath the town’s ramparts did not die of war wounds, as previous archaeologists had assumed, but from poison gas.

Antidotes and Solutions

hannibal in frescoMithridatium (2th Century BC) – Italian archaeologists excavating a Roman villa near Pompeii discovered a large vat containing the residue of whatever had been stored in the container since AD 79. Tests of the residue revealed a mixture of powerful medicinal plants, including opium poppy seeds, along with the flesh and bones of reptiles. According to the archaeologists, the vat may have been used to prepare a secret universal antidote believed to counteract all known poisons. This concoction, a combination of small doses of poisons and their antidotes, called Mithridatium, had been invented by King Mithridates VI of Pontus, a brilliant military strategist and master of toxicology, about one hundred years earlier. His recipe was perfected by the Emperor Neros personal physician and became the worlds most sought-after antidote, long prescribed for European royalty.

Pigs vs. Elephants – War pigs are pigs said to have been used – at most, rarely – in ancient warfare as a countermeasure to war elephants. Pliny the Elder reported that “elephants are scared by the smallest squeal of the hog”. The Romans would later use the squeals of pigs to frighten Pyrrhus’ elephants. Procopius, in book VIII of his History of the Wars, records the defenders of Edessa using a pig suspended from the walls to frighten away Khosrau’s siege elephants. (War Pigs – as encountered in Rome: Total War – are most likely a myth.)

Stopping the Plague (4th Century BC) – Hippocrates is said to have saved Athens from a big plague: “During the gold century of Perricles, a big plague invaded Athens when a lot of the citizens died. The greatest doctors of Greece came to Athens but they could not save the town. Then Pericles called on Hippocrates for help. He made people built and set light to big fires around the town in order to destroy the bacteria. In this way Athens was saved. He found this solution while he was walking in town; he saw that most of the people were infected by the plague, except for the blacksmiths who were next to the fire all day.”

The Vale of York Hoard – Viking Treasure purchased by the British Museum

The vessel being unpacked.An important Viking hoard of jewels and coins unearthed in England by a father-and-son team of treasure hunters in 2007 has been acquired by the British Museum and the Yorkshire Museum in York. It will go on display next month. The Vale of York hoard – previously known as the Harrogate hoard – is valued at 1.1 million pounds ($1.8 million) and is at least 1,000 years old. It includes objects from Afghanistan, Ireland, Russia and Scandinavia, underlining the global spread of cultural contacts during medieval times.

The York Museums Trust in York, northern England, and the British Museum in London bought the treasure, which they say is the most important find of its kind in Britain for 160 years, for 1,082,800.

The major Viking hoard was discovered in the Harrogate area in January 2007 by metal-detectorists David and Andrew Whelan. The father and son detecting team promptly reported the hoard to their local Finds Liaison Officer, and displayed exemplary behaviour in not unpacking all the objects from the bowl, but keeping the find intact. Under the Treasure Act 1996 all finders of gold and silver objects, and groups of coins from the same finds, over 300 years old, have a legal obligation to report such items. As a possible Treasure find, it was then transferred to the British Museum where conservators have carefully excavated each find to avoid damaging the individual objects or losing important contextual information.

Contents of the Harrogate Hoard vesselIt is the largest and most important Viking hoard found in Britain since that discovered at Cuerdale, Lancashire, in 1840 which contained more than 8,000 objects. Mr Fell, Coroner, commented: “Treasure cases are always interesting, but this is one of the most exciting cases that I have ever had to rule on. Im delighted that such an important Viking hoard has been discovered in North Yorkshire. We are extremely proud of our Viking heritage in this area.”

For David Whelan and his son Andrew, who made the discovery, it was a treasure hunter’s dream come true. “Being keen metal detectorists, we always dreamt of finding a hoard, but to find one from such a fantastic period of history is just unbelievable,” father and son said in a statement. “The contents of the hoard we found went far beyond our wildest dreams and hopefully people will love seeing the objects on display in York and London for many, many years to come.” They will divide the proceeds from the sale with the owner of the land where it was found.

Like other Viking hoards of the period, the Vale of York hoard contains a mixture of different precious metal objects, including coins, complete ornaments, ingots (bars) and chopped-up fragments known as hack-silver. The hoard also shows the diversity of cultural contacts in the medieval world, with objects coming from as far apart as Afghanistan in the East and Ireland in the West, as well as Russia, Scandinavia and continental Europe.

X Ray of the Harrogate HoardThe most spectacular single object is a gilt silver vessel, made in what is now France in the first half of the ninth century. It was probably intended for use in church services, and was believed to have been looted by Vikings from a monastery or given to them as a tribute. Most of the smaller objects were hidden inside this vessel, which was itself protected by some form of lead container. As a result, the hoard was extremely well-preserved.

Other star objects include a rare gold arm-ring, and over 600 coins, including several new or rare types. These provide valuable new information about the history of England in the early tenth century, as well as Yorkshires wider cultural contacts in the period. For instance, one of the hoard’s coins teaches us that worshippers of Thor were being encouraged to Christianise their allegiance by switching the Scandanavian god for Peter, as it features St Peter but also the hammer of Thor. Interestingly, the hoard contains coins relating to Islam and to the pre-Christian religion of the Vikings, as well as to Christianity.

Conservation work has recently started on the hoard to restore it to its former glory. More information on the hoard has come to light through this process. The vessel which contained most of the hoard can now be seen to be decorated with niello (a black metal inlay), as well as extensive gilding. New details are also visible in the decoration of some of the silver jewellery fragments, and in the designs and inscriptions of the coins.

The hoard was probably buried for safety by a wealthy Viking leader during the unrest that followed the conquest of the Viking kingdom of Northumbria in AD 927 by the Anglo-Saxon king Athelstan. The Viking army conquered Northumbria in 869 and it remained under Viking control for nearly 60 years.

This major Viking hoard, an important and exciting find, is joint-owned and will be displayed equally between the two partners. Highlights of the hoard will go on display at the Yorkshire Museum in York from September 17 to November 1 before moving to the British Museum.

Digital Reconstruction of the Antikythera Mechanism

El Mecanismo de AntikytheraThe Antikythera Mechanism is one of the most debated – execpt perhaps the Elgin Marbles – Greek artefacts. Where the frieze of the Parthenon leaves us with mainly one single question, ‘Who does it belong to?’, this no-doubt ingenious ancient device raises a myriad questions like, ‘When and by whom was it created?’; What purpose did it serve?’; ‘How did it look in its entirety?’ and, ‘What was it doing on board of the Antikythera Wreck?’ Scholars around the world are working hard to resolve these issues, and every year new answers surface. One thing all the scholars agree on, however, is that the Antikythera Mechanism is the oldest analogue computer discovered (up until now).

The Antikythera Mechanism’s History

(To skip the history and go straight to the virtual reconstruction, click here.) The Roman ship carrying the Antikythera mechanism had sunk off the coast of the Greek island, Antikythera, the wreck and its contents being consistent with a date in the 1st century BC. The famous Jacques Cousteau recovered coins from the wreck, which reinforces a view that this had been a treasure ship from General Sulla on its way to Rome, carrying booty from Pergamon after the First Mithridatic War. It has been speculated that the ship foundered because of its age – its wood is dated to the 2th century BC – and perhaps because it was overloaded with treasures including a number of particularly large statues. Those statues are now on display in the National Archaeological Museum in Athens, alongside the Antikythera Mechanism.

How long does it take to make such a machine? “Exactly the same time as giving birth to a child, my wife says with a laugh,” says Mr Vicentini

The Antikythera Mechanism is widely considered to be one of the most important archaeological artefacts ever found. When it was discovered in 1902 by archaeologist Valerios Stais, it was thought to be one of the first mechanised clocks. We now know it is an ancient mechanical calculator designed to model astronomical phenomenon with remarkable detail. It appears to be constructed upon theories of astronomy and mathematics developed by Greek astronomers, and it is thought to have been made between 150 and 100 BC.

Most likely we’ll never know for sure who envisioned this ancient computer made out of – for the time precious – bronze, but most likely it was created on the island of Rhodes by someone of the Hipparchus School. The mechanism contains a lunar apparatus which uses astronomer Hipparchus’ theory of the motion of the Moon; and Rhodes was one of the major academic centres at the time in Europe.

When a date was entered via a crank, the Antikythera Mechanism would reveal to its owner the position of the Sun, Moon, or other astronomical information such as the location of other planets. There is reference in the inscriptions for the planets Mars and Venus, and it would have certainly been within the capabilities of the maker of this mechanism to include gearing to show their positions. There is some speculation that the mechanism may have had indicators for all the five planets known to the Greeks – yet none of this gearing for such planetary mechanisms survives, save for one which is otherwise unaccounted for. The front dial includes a precursor to the modern day Almanac, which was used to mark the rising and setting of specific stars. Each star is thought to be identified by Greek characters which cross-reference details inscribed on the mechanism. The ancient astronomical calculator used the 365-day Egyptian calendar – the Sothic year – and could be adjusted to compensate for the effect of the extra quarter-day in the solar year.

New discoveries by the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project

In the past few years more than a Terrabyte of data – 1000 gigabytes or 200 DVDs – has been collected and processed by the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project. This data contains digital photographs, surface images or Polynomial Texture Mapping images (PTMs) and 2D and 3D X-ray scans, some of which are available online. The imaging system enabled much more of the Greek inscription to be viewed and translated, from about 1,000 characters that were visible previously to over 2,160 characters – representing about 95% of the extant text.

Antikythera Mechanism Reconstruction by Mogi Massimo VicentiniThe Antikythera Mechanism Research Project detected in July 2008 the word “Olympia” on a bronze dial thought to display the 76 year Callippic cycle, as well as the names of other games in ancient Greece. Jo Marchant at the New Scientist expands on this:

One new clue I mentioned to the origin of the mechanism comes from the Olympiad dial – there are six sets of games named on the dial, five of which have been deciphered so far. Four of them, including the Olympics, were major games known across the Greek world. But the fifth, Naa, was much smaller, and would only have been of local interest. The Naa games were held in Dodona in northwestern Greece, so Alexander Jones of the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World in New York has suggested that the mechanism must have been made by or for someone from that area.

Intriguingly, this could mean the device is even older than thought. The inscriptions have been dated to around 100 BC, but according to Jones the device may have been made at latest in the early second century BC, because after that the Romans devastated or took over the Greek colonies in the region, so it’s unlikely that people would still have been using the Greek calendar there.

It has taken some of the highest-tech imagery, and a highly multi-disciplinary team to finally piece together much of the Mechanisms function. However the research is far from complete, and there is a general consensus that the Mechanism hasnt relinquished all of it secrets just yet.

Physical and digital models of the Antikythera Mechanism

There are quite a few young and old replicas of the Antikythera Mechanism; the oldest one by Robert Deroski; one by Michael Wright, who has built a fully-working model of the Mechanism using traditional methods; and a model by Mogi Massimo Vicentini.

How long does it take to create such a reconstruction? Mr Vicentini claims that by working mostly during his spare time it took him about nine months, from conceivement to presentation of the physical model: “Exactly the same as giving birth to a child, my wife says with a laugh,” he jokes. And where to visit this replica? If not requested for presentations or temporary exhibitions, it stays safely at Mr. Vicentini’s home, but at his website you can have a glimpse through some photographs.

Virtual Reconstruction of the Antikythera Mechanism

Mogi Vicentini recently created a splendid virtual model of the Antikythera Mechanism, based on the theoretical and mechanical model of Michael Wright. He kindly gave permission to include it in this blogpost, and I suggest you definitely watch it, as it helps to understand this ingenious mechanism:

For a larger version of this video, more virtual renders and VRML files of the Antikythera Mechanism, visit Mr. Vicentini’s website at www.mogi-vice.com.

But it’s perhaps the 3Drender by Mogi Massimo Vicentini, that he worked on with Michael Wright, of a virtual model of the complete machine that speaks most to the imagination. And in more than one way! “While working on the model of Antikythera , I noticed that 3DStudio Max began behaving oddly, crashing more and more frequently,” he says. “This has been my most complex virtual model so far – maybe I’ve pushed the software to its limits… or this might just be the effect of some Antikythera “black magic”, as experienced by many other peoples involved in it.” Luckily Mr Vicentini was able to compile and send the finished video the night before the technical opening of the exhibition at the Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze.

I asked Mr Vicentini if there are any ‘Pyramidiot’ level theories about the device, as the Antikythere Mechanism website does mention frequently asked questions like, ‘Is its existence evidence of time travel?’ and ‘Was it left by aliens?’ Until this day, Mr Vicentini has not found any really bad interpretations of the Antikythera Mechanism, “But I must add, as personal choice we have no TV set at home, so I might have missed something odd!” He reckons this might be because it’s just too difficult an object for easy speculation, and that it has been thorougly examined by the most serious scholars. It is true, even incomplete, that the inscriptions leave no reasonable doubt as to the mechanism’s general purpose.

When Mogi Vicentini started his research on the Antikythera Computer, not many resources were available – let alone online: “I was going for a Price model in 2006, as I suddenly discovered the new finds by the Antikythera Research Group, and I had to redesign most of the layout,” he sighs. “After completing my mechanism, I learned that Mr. Wright had actually built a working model including planets and eventually we got in contact via a common friend, Mr. Fabio Soso of Geneve. He saw my work, presented us to each other, and suggested our cooperation for a virtual model of the complete machine. Before then, I relied on some sparse notes published as thesis or on magazines like ‘Scientific American’ and ‘Nature’, but now I would warmly suggest Marchants’ book as a good and well-balanced source for an overall view of the story.”

For further learning and browsing on this interesing topic, there is Mr Vicentini’s website – mogi-vice.com – containing lots of images of both the physical and the digital models, as well as diffent VRML schematic models of the Antikythera Machine, based on Price, Bromley and the Antikythera Mechanism Research Project Group. For updates on recent research you best keep an eye on antikythera-mechanism.gr.

Lord Elgin’s Firman – Permission Granted?

The Return of an Elgin MarbleWhen the British Museum is explaining why they should not return the Elgin Marbles – and how they acquired them in the first place – they often offer two old letters as proof of their entitlement on the Parthenon Friezes: a copy of letter written by Philip Hunt talking about the ‘Firman’, a letter of permission, as well as a translation of the Firman in Italian dating to 1801. But was ‘feel free to ship half the Parthenon to Britain’ really what the Ottoman Firman said?

In a recent statement Neil McGregor, director of the British Museum, said on the removal of the Parthenon marbles from Greek soil that “there’s no question it was legal because you can’t move those things without the approval of the power of the day. It was clearly allowed, or it it wouldn’t have happened.”

The British Museum in an official statement – and after pointing out that the Louvre, the National Museum in Copenhagen, the Wurzburg University, the Vatican Museums, the Glyptothek in Munich and the Kunsthistorische Museum in Vienna hold sculptures from the Parthenon in their collection too – denies that the collection was “stolen” by Lord Elgin because “Lord Elgin’s work was carried out openly and with the support of local officials both Turkish and Greek.” Surely, the Firman letter will prove that the removal of the Parthenon sculptures was legal?

What does the Firman letter say?

We need to keep in mind that the Firman letter in possession of the British Museum – it was on public display from October 2008 to April 2009 – is a translation to Italian from the original document, which was lost in time. The translation was made by the Venetian dragoman (translator and diplomatic negotiator) Antonio Dan so that Lord Elgin and the Rev. Philip Hunt might know exactly what the Turkish document said. The British Museum still displays the document on it’s website and supplies us with a English translation.

“… nor hinder them from taking away any pieces of stone with inscriptions, and figures, …” – the Firman

The Firman letter speaks of English painters employed by Lord Elgin, which should be not hindered in making models of the ornaments and visible figures, in measuring the remains of the ruined buildings nor “… in undertaking to dig, according to need, the foundations to find the inscribed blocks, which may have been preserved in the rubble

But surely, they were allowed to take some memorabilia home? The translation of the Firman letter says on this: ” …and when they wish to take away some pieces of stone with old inscriptions, and figures, that no opposition be made… .” A the end the Firman letter changes its tone: ” … nor hinder them from taking away any pieces of stone with inscriptions, and figures, … .

It does sound like a carte blanche to chisel parts of the Parthenon? The British Museum certainly believes so, in their statement it asserts that there was no exclusion clause concerning removal of material from buildings and walls, based on that final fragment of the Firman letter.

Reading between the Firman letter’s lines

CultureGrll – Lee Rosembaum for ArtsJournal.com – took a look at the Firman letter, and concludes that what has come down to us through the translation seems to fall far short of blanket permission for Lord Elgin and his men to hack slabs of the famous frieze from the walls of the Parthenon. Lee Rosembaum points out we should look at the context of the previous parts of the letter:

But reading the phrase that permitted removal of “any pieces of stone” in the context of what came before it—the reference to objects “preserved among the rubble”—makes it appear likely that intent of this convolutedly worded edict was to allow removal of loose pieces at the base of the monument, not of the frieze slabs still affixed to its walls.

You can access it and try to decipher it for yourself, but It seems to me that a close reading of the English translation of the firman undermines, rather than supports, the British Museum’s legal argument. Maybe that’s why MacGregor is now arguing that the removal was “legal” because Ottoman officials obviously knew what was going on.

Lee Rosenbaum also points out she’s not the first to have such opinion. She quotes the ‘The Parthenon Frieze’ book by Jenifer Neils, professor of art history and classics at Case Western Reserves on the issue:

The official firman…does not specifically grant authority to remove the superstructure of the temple, but rather to ‘carry away some pieces of stone with inscriptions and figures’ (presumably those lying around the Acropolis after the explosion of 1687). (‘The Parthenon Frieze’, p. 241, Jenifer Neils)

What do you think? Did Lord Elgin get his marbles only due to a loophole, and ‘administrative error’? Should we judge Lord Elgin according to the times he lived in, and on his good intentions to improve the arts of Great Britain by making available casts and drawings of Greek monuments previously known only from drawings and engravings as the British Museum suggests? (No mentioning of chiselling there.) And what about a full transcription of Reverend Philip Hunt’s letter, in which he laments the damage being done to the sculptures of the Parthenon? And last but not least:

Should the Parthenon statues be returned to Greece?