The big mystery the new Tut research did not solve - Amarna Art

Akhenaten and Family - limestoneThe King Tut results are in and right now everyone is going gaga over the fact that malaria appears to have played a role in the boy king's death. While this is an interesting find, there is another discovery - King Tut looked fairly normal, or at least he did not have a significantly bizarre or feminine physique - which also carries major implications for Ancient Egyptian research.

First a bit of background.

During the reign of Akhenaten (who is probably Tut's father) Egyptian art became, well, very weird.

The formal prose that the Egyptians had followed for thousands of years was thrown out the door. Figures were depicted with long cone shaped heads, spindly fingers and distorted bodies. Intimate scenes involving the ruler, such as Akhenaten kissing his daughter, were depicted for the first time.

This art style, referred to as Amarna Art, was prominent throughout Akhenaten’s reign and a few years afterwards. By the time of King Tut it had largely died out.  

Why Egyptian art appears this way, for such a short period of time, is a mystery. About a decade ago Egyptologist Alwyn Burridge proposed that Akhenaten and other members of his family suffered from Marfan Syndrome - a condition that leads to an appearance similar to that shown in Amarna Art.

Burridge emphasizes that while this condition affects ones appearance, it has no impact on intelligence. Indeed Abraham Lincoln had Marfan Syndrome and is regarded as one of the most successful presidents in American history.

Another theory, published last year in the Annals of Internal Medicine, is that Akhenaten had a form of Antley-Bixler Syndrome or a combination of aromatase excess syndrome and sagittal craniosynostosis syndrome.

All of these theories operate on the idea that Amarna art is so unusual because Akhenaten and his family suffered from a medical condition that affected their physical appearance.

New findings dispute feminine physique

The problem is that researchers ruled out Marfan Syndrome in the new findings. They also say that the physical appearance of Tut and Akhenaten was probably not unusual.

They say that the heads of Akhenaten and Tut display no sign that they were cone shaped, although Tut’s great-grandfather, Yuya, displays some evidence of distortion. Akhenaten’s fragmented pelvis also displayed no signs of a physically altering condition.

Tutankhamun shortly after the discovery of KV62, photographed by Harry Burton. - Image copyright Griffith Institute

The researchers conclude that - “Therefore, the particular artistic presentation of persons in the Amarna period is confirmed as a royally decreed style most probably related to the religious reforms of Akhenaten. It is unlikely that either Tutankhamun or Akhenaten actually displayed a significantly bizarre or feminine physique.”

A royal decree?

So is it time to stop chasing medical explanations and believe that, for some unexplained reason, Akhenaten decided that he just wanted the people in Egyptian art to be drawn in a way never before seen?

I talked to Burridge over the phone yesterday. Given that the news has just broke, she needs some time to study the medical results before deciding how this affects her Marfan Syndrome theory. It’s also possible that other medical researchers could challenge the results. Although media reports travel fast, it takes time for scientists and scholars to create a reasoned response to complicated research.

In some ways a royal decree based on his own whims doesn’t seem so far-fetched for Akhenaten. Aside from the art there were other things he did that were pretty off base for a pharaoh. He focused Egyptian religion around the worship of the Aten, a sun-disc. In doing so he unleashed an iconoclasm that saw the names of other gods desecrated. Evidence for this has been found as far away at Tell el-Borg, a frontier fortress in the Sinai Desert.

He also decided to build an entirely new capital called Amarna, out in the desert. It was only in use for a short time and became a ghost town not long after his reign. Heritage Key’s Malcolm Jack interviewed the site’s excavator, Professor Barry Kemp, recently.

If the new research holds up, Egyptologists looking to answer the riddle of Amarna art are going to have to look into Akhenaten’s mind for the answers. This will be a process that, I daresay, will be a great deal more difficult then looking for a physical medical condition.

Read 6 comments, or leave your own

About The AuthorOwen Jarus
Owen Jarus (follow me: e-mail or RSS feed for owenjarus)
Owen Jarus is a freelance writer based in Toronto ,Canada. He has written articles on archaeology for a variety of media outlets including The Canadian Press newswire (CP), U of T Magazine, The Mississauga News and The Guelph Mercury. Education: BA from the University of Toronto in History, Geography and Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations.

Comments

True. I guess that the 'Paris Hilton syndrome'* won't fly here. Just the effort that would be required to tell (and train) every sculptor in the new art style would already be gigantic.

* The world sees what Paris Hilton is where on tv. The next day, the entire world as a semi-identical outfit.

 Interesting. I always assumed it was a result of skull binding practices- so it would be a bit of 'Paris Hilton syndrome' in that the people of the day did strange things to their bodies in order to live up to popular images.

...perhaps I'm the stooge here, but looking at that relief, it looks like he's just wearing a tall hat. :/

I understand :) It's difficult to sum Amarna art up in a pic or two. You really need to look at a whole gallery of pics to see how strange it is, compared to other Egyptian art. It's really amazing stuff.

Owen, did they ever find 'intermediate' art (not from the Intermediate period, but a crossover between the normal and Amarna art? (Because, even if Akhenaton got the idea all on his own, there must have been a few 'trials' before his artists totally understood and adjusted to what he wanted?)

Hi Ann, that's a good question. W. Stevenson Smith and William Simpson write of early reliefs in the Aten shrine at Karnak that display "tentative steps" towards Amarna style.

The problem with looking for transitions is that Amarna art is very short-lived. It existed during Akhenaten's rule and that's about it. It's not like a long-lived art trend that can be analyzed over hundreds of years.

Interesting Articles And Blog Posts
King Tut's Medical History and Autopsy Report
Leg fracture and brain malaria cause King Tut's death?
King Tut Unwrapped - Tutankhamun Mummy Forensics to Air on Discovery Channel
Interesting Publications
Amarna Sunset: Nefertiti, Tutankhamun, Ay, Horemheb, and the Egyptian Counter-Reformation
Purchase this product from Amazon.comPurchase this product from Amazon.co.uk
The American University in Cairo Press (15 Nov 2009)
by Aidan Dodson

find Heritage Key on Flickr, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter or Subscribe to RSS for the Latest News

LOG OUT - MY ACCOUNT - SITE NEWS - ABOUT - FAQ - CONTACT - TERMS OF USE - PRIVACY - EDITORIAL POLICY

Teacher? Check out our 3D Interactive Fieldtrips at QuestHistory.com

Virtual Experience - Articles & Blogs - Video - Directory - Calendar - Publications & Reviews - Quizzes - Discuss - Downloads - Subscribe - Find us on the web - Search
King Tut - Stonehenge - Terracotta Warriors - Pyramids - Archaeology - Britain - China - Egypt - Greece - Rome
© 2009-2011 Heritage Key

Subscribe to Heritage Key Updates
Email: