Ostrich Egg Shells Discovered in South Africa Could be Earliest Evidence of Human Language

Archaeologists in South Africa have recently unearthed some of the earliest evidence of human behavior - a cache of ostrich eggs dating back 60,000 years, etched with intricate geometric designs. 

The abstract carvings are signs of what archaeologists call 'symbolic thinking,' a capacity particular to Homo sapiens. Unlike earlier hominids, our brains allow us to affix meaning to objects, to draw associations, to recognize and create symbols. 
Symbolic thinking is the roots of writing, language and art; it is, to risk grandiosity, what makes us human. 

So when the team at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, led by prehistorian Pierre-Jean Texier, dug up the 60,000-year-old decorated ostrich eggs, they knew they'd found something special. The eggs suggest that we 'became human' - i.e. started creating art, decorating objects and thinking symbolically - 20,000 earlier than scholars had originally thought.



The Creative Explosion Theory - Blasted

Until the 1990s, the accepted date for the dawn of modern thought was give-or-take 40,000 years ago. Homo sapiens, so the theories went, were anatomically modern by 200,000 years ago in Africa, but they didn't adopt modern cognitive behavior until after they arrived in Europe. The stunning late Upper Paleolithic cave paintings at Chauvet, and Lascaux (Chauvet dates back roughly 35,000 years), were evidence of what scholars called a 'creative explosion'. This, experts surmised, was the moment in history when language, art, and symbolic thinking converged in a great burst of cognitive power. It was, in other words, when humankind became human. 

The decorated ostrich eggs bolster Henshilwood's assertion that the abstract designs scratched into the ochre at Blombos were not haphazard doodles, but evidence of Middle Stone Age symbolic thinking.
These theories held until strange outliers started turning up at archaeological digs in Africa. Namely at a site called Blombos Cave, located about 180 miles east of Capetown, South Africa. Between 1991 and 2002, State University of New York (Stony Brook) archaeologist Christopher Henshilwood uncovered a treasure trove of artifacts which pointed to early symbolic thinking. Among other things, his team found tiny decorative mollusk beads and complex bone tool kits. Most remarkable, though, were pieces of ochre inscribed with a grid of elaborate geometric patterns. Given the complex nature of the designs, and the fact that ochre is a soft material, unsuitable for practical uses like tool-making, Henshilwood asserted that the etched ochre was a case of decoration, and evidence of complex thought. He went one step further with his hypothesis, suggesting that the intricate cross-hatched designs "could have been interpreted by those people as having meaning that would have been understood by others." In other words, they were based on language

But the part that had the scientific community scratching its head was the age of the finds: the stratum of rock from which these objects were excavated was dated between 77,000 and 70,000 years. That's about 40,000 years earlier than the gooey-sounding "creative explosion" in Europe. Of course, these little cross-hatches didn't hold a candle to the masterpieces in Chauvet and Lascaux. But the implications of the find were no less astounding. Talk about an altered timeline: according to the discoveries at Blombos, our ancestors had been behaving and thinking like modern humans for twice as long as scholars thought. Nevermind the holes this theory exposed in an entirely Euro-centric version of the history of humankind.

Creative Expression... or First Signs of Language?

Of course, there were doubts about the finds at Blombos. Steve Kuhn, anthropologist at the University of Arizona told the BBC back in 2002, "I'd be more comfortable if there were more of these engraved stones; if these alleged symbols were found many times in different places. It is possible they were just doodlings that really didn't mean anything."

Which is why the recent find at Diepkloof is so significant. The decorated ostrich eggs bolster Henshilwood's assertion that the abstract designs scratched into the ochre at Blombos were not haphazard doodles, but evidence of Middle Stone Age symbolic thinking. The team at Diepkloof, which has been digging at the site since 1999, has unearthed shards from approximately 25 ostrich eggs across 18 archaeological layers, dated between 55,000 and 65,000 years ago. However rudimentary the scratchmarks, the team is convinced that they display complex order. Not only do the decorations show varying styles, including parallel lines with cross-hatches (like rail-road tracks) and repetitive non-parallel lines, but the styles appear to evolve over time. The railroad track motif, for example, appears only in the earliest 12 layers of the site, then disappears.

The greatest evidence for symbolism in these markings, though, is that a number of the fragments were intentionally pierced with a tool to bore a hole in the top part of the egg. Texier and his team take this as evidence that these large eggs, which had a volume of roughly one litre, were used as canteens, a practice they recognized from historic hunter-gatherers in the Kalahari desert. The same way we might put labels on the ‘sugar’ and ‘coffee’ jars in the kitchen, the Kalahari tribes decorated their eggs with markings to denote their contents or ownership. If, 60,000 years ago, Middle Stone Age hunter-gatherers at Diepkloof were doing the same, then, as the team has said, the ostrich eggs “[represent] the earliest evidence of the existence of a graphic tradition among prehistoric hunter-gatherer populations.” Not to mention that they extend the history of humankind by 20,000 years. 

Read 5 comments, or leave your own

About The Author
Will Hunt (follow me: RSS feed for willhunt)
Will Hunt is an American freelance writer based in Chennai, India. He studied English and Portuguese as an undergraduate, then received a Thomas J. Watson Fellowship to research various archaeological sites throughout the ancient world. His writing has appeared in various places, including Rolling Stone and Men's Journal.

Comments

 I read about this find in Discovery News and must say that this article is much better and more enjoyable than the Discovery one. I would like to thank the author for pointing out the possibility that the designs could have been intended to indicate the ingredients of the canteen, a connection which I failed to make when reading the Discovery article. And perhaps the designs did have such meanings. It does seem strange to me, however, that geometric designs and patterns could have been used to communicate meanings the same way we use written words today. I will keep open the possibility that the designs could have simply been decoration. And, call me crazy if you will, but from my viewpoint archaeology seems to be showing more and more that man has been intelligent and "human" from the beginning. Just look at Neanderthal, once considered a savage brute, but whom we now know wore jewelry, lived in tents, cared for their sick, played musical instruments, and showed other signs of intelligent culture. Things are not always what they first may appear.

Glad you enjoyed the article, Krysta. Fascinating find, no? I agree with you about the intelligence of our ancient ancestors. Every time we turn around, it seems, there's more evidence of complexity and intelligence. Today, we shake our heads at the way people a hundred years ago viewed ancient man; I wonder if a hundred years from now, people will shake their heads at our ignorance. Thought you might enjoy this Guaridan article from a few weeks ago. 

Thank you for this most interesting article.  I'm happy that these etchings have some to light.  It certainly seems that the more we know, the more there is to find out.

"Today, we shake our heads at the way people a hundred years ago viewed ancient man; I wonder if a hundred years from now, people will shake their heads at our ignorance."

 Wow, that is absolutely profound. Could anyone have said it better? I think I am going to quote that.

<p>Thank you for your sharing.</p>

Interesting Articles And Blog Posts
Chauvet: The World's Oldest Cave Paintings?
Beads: Ritual and Ornamentation – What Africa's Khoe-San were wearing 77,000 years ago

find Heritage Key on Flickr, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter or Subscribe to RSS for the Latest News

LOG OUT - MY ACCOUNT - SITE NEWS - ABOUT - FAQ - CONTACT - TERMS OF USE - PRIVACY - EDITORIAL POLICY

Teacher? Check out our 3D Interactive Fieldtrips at QuestHistory.com

Virtual Experience - Articles & Blogs - Video - Directory - Calendar - Publications & Reviews - Quizzes - Discuss - Downloads - Subscribe - Find us on the web - Search
King Tut - Stonehenge - Terracotta Warriors - Pyramids - Archaeology - Britain - China - Egypt - Greece - Rome
© 2009-2011 Heritage Key

Subscribe to Heritage Key Updates
Email: