Tag: Avebury

Britain’s Prehistoric Funerals – Six Feet Under, or a Bronze Age Mound?

Mary-Ann Craig talks to Heritage Key about the fascinating discoveries at Irthlingborough, Solstice at sites across the country and how the Amesbury Archer wasn't quite the all action hero! Click the image to skip to the video.

You might never have heard of Irthlingborough, in Northamptonshire, but an excavation there in the 1980s revealed some pretty spectacular archaeology, as explained in the first of a series of HKTV videos (Watch the Video).

The archaeologists found a round burial mound with cremations buried in the sides.

Below the cremation burials, there was a lattice of rotted cattle bones, which had been placed on the top of a heaped stone cairn. Below the cairn was a wooden platform that had now collapsed, and below the platform, at the heart of the mound, was a chamber, with a mans body inside.

He was curled up on his side, and was surrounded by grave goods 11 flint blades, an arrowhead, a beaker, an archers wristguard, five jet buttons, an amber ring, carved cows ribs, a boars tusk, shaped stones and an incredibly special, totally unused, flint dagger. The jet buttons had come from Yorkshire, the dagger from East Anglia, the stones from Wessex, and the amber all the way from the coast of the Baltic Sea.

This was a man with connections.

And along with the 184 cattle heads that had been placed on top of his grave, there was one other addition. Another body. An adult male, in a crouched position, placed in a small pit next to the first body. The only thing this second man had with him was a bone needle.

The Neolithic, or late Stone Age, moves into the Bronze Age in around 2400BC, when metalworking first comes to Britain. But its not just that stone tools get replaced by metal ones.

Culture Shift

This is a time of massive cultural change:

For starters, they went monument crazy they built the massive stone rings on the Orkney Islands and at Avebury, the beautiful passage grave at Newgrange in Ireland, Silbury Hill, the largest prehistoric mound in Europe, and they went to town on Stonehenge, erecting the enormous Sarsen stones weighing up to 50 tonnes each into the complete circle and central horseshoe that we still see today.

Round Barrows are small circular mounds that cover an individual burial or cremation. Image Credit - Jim Champion.

The pottery they had been using in the late Stone Age is called Grooved Ware a tradition that stretched across the British Isles, the pots had simple patterns pushed into the clay, often making them look like basketry. It was a style that had been around since 3000BC, pretty much unchanged for 500 years.

But by the mid 3rd millennium, the early bronze age, we start to find a totally new style called Beaker ware.

Beakers are smaller, finer, and very carefully decorated. It was a technique and design that had come from continental Europe. This wasnt everyday crockery theyre most often found in graves, the earliest with adult men, but then increasingly with women and childrens burials too.

These new style of graves are called Round Barrows, small, circular mounds that cover an individual burial or cremation.

Often they got used again to deposit later cremations, but the early Bronze Age is the first time we see individual people getting individual burials.

HD Video: Mary-Ann Craig on the History of Stonehenge

(Read the transcript of this video here)

Newgrange, Ireland and Maeshowe, Orkney are both aligned to the Midwinter solstice. Thanks to Orkneyman for the clarification.

Stone Age, All in it Together

The Neolithic was all about communal burial they built what we call Long Barrows, tombs that held the bones of many people, jumbled together, and added to with every generation.

These tombs were important, powerful places, where the world of the living met the realm of the ancestors.

These ancestors would have been powerful beings who could control things beyond the human world the rain and wind, the fertility of the earth, and perhaps offer protection from illness and attack from other tribes.

West Kennet Avenue connects the south entrance of the Avebury Henge to the Sanctuary. Image Credit - Phil Selby.

A fantastic example of a Neolithic tomb is the West Kennet Long Barrow. Its about twenty five miles from Stonehenge, and if youre going to Wiltshire to see Stonehenge, be sure to go to West Kennet and Avebury nearby. You can go right into the tomb and explore this amazing place for yourself.

Constructed in around 3600BC, its within a rectangular mound, 100m long, with ditches on each side. Theres a central passageway, with five stone chambers inside.

Bodies werent placed in the tomb whole instead, the Neolithic farmers followed a process called excarnation, where the bones are defleshed before putting them into the tomb. Either they laid the bodies out for the flesh to rot away or they let animals and birds pick the bones clean (when you find gnawing or bite marks), or they cut away the flesh, butchering the bodies. Once cleaned, the bones were collected and sorted.

Only selected bones went into the tomb, and theres an odd shortage of skulls and thigh bones. The ones that you do find in long barrows look worn and polished which means that they were carefully used for something – perhaps they were taken in and out of the tomb, carried around, and used in rituals in the community.

West Kennet Long Barrow remained in use for hundreds of years, but only 46 people were buried in it. We dont know where everyone else ended up its the ongoing mystery of the missing majority

The End of an Era

Click To Watch Video
Profile: Mary-Ann Craig
Anthropologist and broadcaster Mary-Ann Craig, who has given a series of talks on Heritage Key TV, tells us a little bit more about herself.

But then at West Kennet, around 2400BC, the decision was taken to fill and block the tomb. After more than a thousand years in existence, the people ritually closed-in the ancient ancestors they filled the whole tomb with soil and stone, and then rolled three massive sarsen boulders across the front entrance.

The archaeology suggests that different local communities brought their own deposits to fill each chamber small amounts of pottery have been found in the soils, and each chamber has a slightly different style of pottery. This suggests that the closing of the Long Barrow wasnt a rash act by one crazy leader, but an agreed and systematic process of shutting shop.

Either way, once it was done there was no going back.

I dont think that its a coincidence that this happens at the same time as the beaker culture appears, and theres all this activity at the big monuments in the surrounding area. Life was changing, and the new society was interested in commemorating individual people, not collective ancestors.

The Grave of the Amesbury Archer. Image Credit - Wessex Archaeology.

There was a new way of burying the dead an exotic, high status style, from the continent. The man in Irthlingborough got it, and so did the most famous Bronze Age burial of them all: The Amesbury Archer.

Oxygen isotope testing shows us he grew up in Alps and travelled here as an adult. Isotope testing is a modern method to determine where ancient people come from. As youre growing up, certain chemical patterns from your food and drink are stored in your bones and tooth enamel. Archaeologists can take samples from human burials and match the particular chemical fingerprint with a specific area in the world. From this testing, and the osteology of his skeleton, we can say that he had travelled from the middle of Europe. Hed sustained a serious leg injury, but been well cared for. He was rich and important. And he was buried in his own grave, with some of the most special items in his society.

You can imagine the procession to this mans burial. Perhaps accompanied by feasting, by music and ritual chanting, he was placed into the grave with all his burial bling, remembered as an individual with a name, a personal story and a personal grave.

Boscombe Rule Breakers

But, as always with prehistoric archaeology, there are sites that appear to break all the rules:

The Boscombe Bowmen were discovered in 2003, seven individuals in one grave. They got their name, bowmen because theyd been buried with a scattering of flint arrowheads. But actually the grave contained the bodies of three men, a male teenager and three young children. The oldest man was curled up, with the bodies of two children nestled at his head, with the cremated remains of the third. The skulls of the men were placed at his feet, and their bones were mixed up, both above and below his body.

The weird thing is that these bones appear worn, as if theyve been used elsewhere first, and the adults bones have been roughly grouped together by type within the grave. These are features of a Neolithic collective burial, but theyve all been placed into one individuals grave which is typically Bronze Age.

And the date? About 2300BC. The start of the Bronze Age.

Whats clear is that things were changing rapidly, and in many areas of life. Isotope analysis shows that the Boscombe Bowmen grew up in Wales, around the area that the Bluestones were quarried from. And weve already identified that the Amesbury Archer was from continental Europe.

People, artefacts, and ideas, were moving rapidly.

This, is the start of a brave new world the world of metal, and wealth, and perhaps it marks the rise of the individual.

25ft Steel Ancestor Celebrates Solstice at Stonehenge

Stonehenge summer solstice 2010 is to be marked by the debut of a 25ft-high steel statue. ‘The Ancestor’, created by local sculptors Andrew Rowlings and Michelle Topps with help from Druids and the local community, will sit 70m from the stone circle and provide an alternative focus of revelry and worship at sunrise, easing congestion within Stonehenge itself.

The Ancestor is as tall as a double-decker bus, and weights a huge seven tons. It has been shrouded in secrecy until today to prevent a further swell of people visiting the already overcrowded event in Wiltshire, which tonight is thought to top the 40,000 mark. Local schools, as well as Cub Scout and Brownie groups have been hard at work on the project, which supposedly represents the spirituality of the ancient people who created Stonehenge with nothing but primitive tools (watch a video about how we’ve had Stonehenge wrong for centuries here).

“We hope that all those at summer solstice will be inspired by the ancestor.”

The result is spectacular. The Ancestor kneels prostrate, his arms outstretched and wearing a Celtic crown. His Easter Island gaze looks upwards at the sun, as thousands will do in approximately five hours’ time (here are some people to look out for at the event). “(The Ancestor) might stand to remind us all that we owe much to our ancestors and might try to be more like them in appreciation of the natural beauty around us,” says Stonehenge Druid Frank Somers.

The statue will be seen as a massive coup for Stonehenge’s pagan community, who have traditionally struggled to have their voices heard over a number of issues – not least the reburial of ‘Charlie’, an ancient child found at nearby Avebury.

“We hope that all those who gather at Stonehenge for summer solstice this year will be inspired by the ancestor,” adds Somers, “and that the ancestors themselves would approve of the way we are honouring them.”

You can see pictures, tweets and trading cards (yes, really!) from Stonehenge live by checking out Ann’s blog, where there’ll no doubt be pictures of the Ancestor as he takes his Stonehenge bow. If you are at the stones now you may want to take a look at this handy guide to get you through the night.

You can also check out this list of alternative places to see in the midsummer sun. Don’t forget that you can also catch the summer solstice at Stonehenge Virtual.

Reimagining Stonehenge – Rejecting the Three Phases

The three phases of Stonehenge? Wrong. In fact you can throw your three phases out the window – it just doesn’t work any more. “We were wrong about Stonehenge,” says anthropologist Mary-Ann Craig during today’s HKTV live lecture. “(Three phases) doesn’t explain it properly: we need phase 3.1; 3.2 and then 3.2b, it doesn’t seem to work.”

Mary-Ann’s lecture on the history of Stonehenge and the mystery of stone circles was an instant hit with the HK office, and our many viewers online. Personally I was fascinated by the idea that Bluestonehenge, a stone circle discovered just last year, may have been a place for women – whose remains have never been confirmed at Stonehenge. Mary-Ann points to the myriad modern religious links between rivers, fertility and femininity. “It’s possible (women) were cremated and instead of their ashes being buried at the stone structure, they were thrown into the river.”

Watch live streaming video from rezzable at livestream.com

I also found amazing the idea that Stonehenge could have been made to segregate society, rather than embrace the wider community: “Neolithic farmers weren’t being quite so nomadic,” says Mary-Ann. “They were carving up territory. The monuments say, ‘you’re one of us,’ and ‘you’re not.'”

View video highlights alongside times here

The lecture came in two short halves – both of which you can see right here – where Mary-Ann not only talks on radical new ideas about Stonehenge but shows you examples of groundbreaking archaeology in Heritage Key’s very own Stonehenge Virtual – check out the screenshot above. And with the summer solstice coming up don’t forget you can see it from your own home just by logging on. What do you think about Mary-Ann’s theories?

Watch live streaming video from rezzable at livestream.com

Questions

At the end of the lecture Mary-Ann took some of your questions which were flying in via Twitter. Skip to video highlights here.

Ellie asked:”What’s the difference between an anthropologist and an archaeologist?”

Mary-Ann: “Anthropology is the study of people…archaeology is the material culture of human beings.”

Behave1223: “Was Stonehenge a kind of castle?”

Mary-Ann: “No, I wouldn’t say it was fortified, it’s not like an Iron Age hillfort. This is more about sacred realms, rituals and non-human power. So not a castle, but definitely a structure that harnesses power.”

Jack_Curly: “How big do you think the society of Stonehenge was?”

Mary-Ann: “In the Mesolithic they were probably in groups of around a hundred, then Neolithic you start to build bigger communities – maybe 10,000 in the area?”

Video Highlights

Video 1:

6m00s: How the three phases of Stonehenge can’t work.

10m40s: The first Stonehenge structure was actually a stone structure.

18m00s: Did Bluestonehenge belong to women?

20m00s: The mystery of the Marlborough sarsens.

Video 2:

3m20s: Mesolithic living wasn’t much fun

7m00s: Avebury, Sanctuary et al – made to keep the neighbours out?

8m00s: Banks and ditches – how Stonehenge kept in its occupants.

Summer solstice is just days away: how will you celebrate? If you’re planning on visiting Stonehenge then make sure you check out Ann’s vital guide. If you can’t make it to Wiltshire then take a look at these alternatives. And keep checking into HKTV: we’ll have our next live lecture this Friday!

Science Versus the Druids: Campaigners Lose Fight For Reburial of Charlie the Avebury Skeleton

The 5,000-year-old skeleton of a young girl known as Charlie, found buried on a hilltop at Avebury in Wiltshire, will remain on public display at the nearby Alexander Keiller Museum where it has resided for 50 years.A campaign for its reburial by the Council of British Druid Orders (CoBDO) was defeated overwhelmingly by weight of government guidelines and expert and public opinion.

The CoBDO argue that its disrespectful for the bones of our ancient ancestors to be stared at or stored in cardboard boxes in dark basements when not the immediate subject of study. In 2006 they selected Charlie who was unearthed in the 1920s at Windmill Hill, and gifted to the public in 1966 as the test case on which to launch a drive for the reburial of “various human remains from archaeological excavations, stored in museums and universities around the country,” according to a statement on the CoBDO website.

A long and expensive public consultation was launched in 2008 by English Heritage, which concluded last week with the announcement that Charlie was staying put. Dr Sebastian Payne, Chief Scientist at English Heritage, commented (quoted by the Wiltshire Gazette and Herald):

We respect the beliefs that have led to this request, and we have taken the request seriously. These remains are important for our understanding of the past.

We found that the public overwhelmingly support the retention and display of prehistoric human remains in museums, and that there is no clear evidence for genetic, cultural or religious continuity of a kind that would justify preferential status to be given to the beliefs of the group which requested reburial.

The decision has been applauded by experts, who have supported Dr Paynes hope that this ruling will aide English Heritage and museums in the future in rejecting further calls for the re-interment of prehistoric human remains.

Government Guidelines and Expert Opinion

The principals set out in the Department for Culture Media and Sports Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums, published in 2005, were the main basis of English Heritages decision.

The physical remains of humans found in archaeological contexts embody knowledge of our past that we have hardly begun to unlock. They must be retained for research that benefits us all.

They recommend that claimants for remains more than 500-years-old need to be able to demonstrate very close and continuous links with the skeleton in question. The Druids who merely claim cultural affinity with pagan heritage failed to do. Furthermore, the skeleton of Charlie discovered in a well-recognised site of archaeological significance, with World Heritage Site status is not only well-preserved and well-documented, but also promises to yield more information as advances in ancient DNA and stable isotope analysis are made. It was therefore deemed to be of more benefit to the public above ground than below.

Professor Sir Barry Cunliffe, an archaeologist at Oxford University commented (also quoted by the Wiltshire Gazette and Herald): The physical remains of humans found in archaeological contexts embody knowledge of our past that we have hardly begun to unlock.

Through a series of scientific techniques now being developed we are able to ask questions about early British populations which even ten years ago would have been thought impossible to answer. Archaeological remains must be retained for research that benefits us all.

Naomi Phillips, Head of Public Affairs for The British Humanist Association, added: The unshared beliefs of people with no more genetic claim over the human remains than anybody else in Western Europe should never trump the enormous scientific, sociological, and educational benefit to the public that the historic human remains provide.

Although this decision does not set a binding precedent, we are hopeful that it will help bodies such as English Heritage to reject any future such requests without such a lengthy and costly consultation period.

Public Support

Avebury Stones HDR 4118

In one public opinion poll of 1,000 people, conducted in June 2009, 90% of respondents said they were comfortable with prehistoric human remains being kept by museums. Comments on the subject of the CoBDO campaign to a local newspaper website This Is Western Daily Press give some indication of the flavour of public opposition to Druids’ calls for the re-burial of prehistoric remains.

CoBDO has no more right to claim any kind of jurisdiction over our past than any other self-elected pressure group, wrote Edwin Deady of Cornwall. The past of Charlie almost certainly predates the Celtic Druids.

In another comment, Thomas Hurlock of Wales wrote: (The CoBDO) made claims that such remains are of their tribal ancestors. Rubbish; the tribes of Britain died out centuries ago, these people have no basis at all for such claims. Media-hungry extremists, who give their religion a very bad public image.

Science, noted Ian Dunbar of Gloucester, should be given free reign to extract as much information as they can so we can all understand more about our own collective past and not be restricted by a self-appointed minority group. I want to know fact about my ancestors, not be restricted by made up religious morals.

Want to hear the druids’ point of view? Watch our video interviews with druids Kim Payne and Frank Somers to find out why “putting granny back” is so important to them.Do you think Charlie should return to Avebury? What about human remains discovered at Stonehenge? Have your say in below.

Google Maps: Britain’s Henges – There’s more than just Stonehenge and Bluehenge!

Stonehenge isn't Britain's only henge. Image Credit - David SmithOther than Stonehenge and the newly discovered Bluehenge, there are other henges across the lenght and breath of Great Britain, as Ann Morgan explained in her post a couple of months back.

What does it take to be a Henge?Henges are at least 20 metres across in size, and have a single raised bank with one, two or four entrances set in strategic positions. Usually in a flat, circular or oval shape, excavations have revealed pottery and bones, fuelling speculation of ancestor worship (or travel by GPS, but that’s a whole other story). Interesting to note is that Stonehenge is not technically a henge then, as it’s bank is inside a ditch!

The henges shown on this map vary across the country, from the top of Scotland to the south of England, yet they’re unique to the British Isles and up to 1,000 years older than the earliest Pyramids!

The Google Map below shows nine henges from around the British Isles. You can see the exact locations of these sites, and easily plan your (real or fantasy) trip through the UK, seeking out the mysterious wonders of the British past!

Google Map: 9 Henges from Britain

By clicking on the relevant Heritage Key icon, you can find out more information about the different sites as well as being able to zoom in.They’re also listed below for convenience, along with links to the various relevant articles and blog entries on Heritage Key, so you can find out more about them:

The map works through Google’s interactive map service, and is easy to navigate by dragging on the map to pull it around. Additionally, you can control the map by using navigation controls in the top right of the corner. The plus and minus buttons allow you to zoom in/out.

Have a look through our Google Earth Tours too to experience flythrough tours of world heritage sites!

Digital Digging – Virtual Reconstructions of Avebury’s Sanctuary and the Durrington Walls using Google Earth

Aerial View of Woodhenge Reconstruction - Google Earth .kmz file by Digital DiggingDigital Digging – run by Henry Rothwell – is a resource for anyone with an interest in archaeology, history, cartography and … digital reconstructions! Digital Digging’s ‘Model Room’ is where they store their virtual reconstructions, created especially for you to explore yourself using Google Earth. It holds a selection of the timber and stone circles of Wessex and Somerset, including Durrington Walls South Circle, Woodhenge, Stanton Drew and the Sanctuary at Avebury. You can look at the image page of each reconstruction or download the associated .kmz file and download the model into Google Earth, where you can get inside it, and look at it from any angle you choose.

There is something fascinating about Digital Digging’s Google Earth-based reconstructions, besides the fact that you can ‘fly’ through them: they are overlayed on satellite images of how the historical sites look nowadays, so you can see wooden posts stick out of concrete roads, cars included. The benefit of having a 3Dmodel finished, is that you can easily create videos out of it, and this is exactly what Henry Rothwell has done:

The Sanctuary at Avebury

The Sanctuary Timber and Stone Circle at Avebury is a prehistoric site on Overton Hill located around 5 miles west of Marlborough in the English county of Wiltshire. It is part of a wider Neolithic landscape which includes the nearby sites of Silbury Hill, West Kennet Long Barrow and Avebury, to which The Sanctuary was linked by the 25m wide and 2.5km long Kennet Avenue. It also lies close to the route of the prehistoric Ridgeway and near several Bronze Age barrows.

The Durrington Walls Timber Circles

Durrington Walls is the site of a Neolithic village and later henge enclosure located in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. It is 2 miles north east of Stonehenge in the parish of Durrington, just north of Amesbury. At 500m in diameter it is the largest henge in Britain, and recent evidence suggests that it was a complementary monument to Stonehenge. What visibly remains of Durrington Walls today is the walls of the henge monument in fact the eroded remains of the inner slope of the bank and the outer slope of the internal ditch.

Digital Digging’s model room is full of timber circles at the moment. There is a reconstruction of Stanton Drew, another of the ‘cricket stumps’ in the Stonehenge car park, one of Woodhenge and the Durrington Walls and the Avebury Sanctuary shown above. If you wish to ‘explore’ these ancient monuments for yourself, can you do so by loading the .kmz files Digital Digging provides into Google Earth. Give it a try, it’s not as scary as it sounds (and instructions are provided)! 😉

And most of all, keep an eye on Digital Digging, as there are more virtual models upcoming: “Reconstructions are the next big project, and although the two sites so far included consist of posts (not massively taxing when all is said and done), I will shortly be trotting off into the Roman Period, and, all going well, putting up the odd Saxon hall or two a few hundred years later.” We’re looking forward to those! (Whilst in the mean while keeping ourselves content with Ancient Rome 3D, Virtual Karnak and of course our very own King Tut Virtual.)

The Ongoing Saga of Stonehenge

DSC_0094_069

Back in 2000, which was by no means the very start of the ‘Stonehenge Saga‘, the Journal of Architectural Conservation published an article by Elizabeth Young and Wayland Kennet outlining the “national disgrace” that constitutes facilities at Stonehenge. The existing visitor centre was slated for its “grubby car park, tiny shop and loos”, and the authors complained that the stones themselves were fenced off. Additionally, attempts to agree on a plan to upgrade facilities had failed completely, and the situation had escalated into a “smouldering dispute that might, without care, burst into acrimonious flames”.

Since the first proposals, in 1991, to build a visitor centre at the Fargo site, any attempts to improve facilities have been thwarted. The size and scale of the site makes it difficult to build anything in walking distance of the stones without endangering the landscape and archaeology of the area, and UNESCO and other heritage organisations have long opposed suggestions that underground tunnels should be built to ferry visitors to the site.

The last 18 years have seen millions of pounds squandered, with plans proposed, opposed and vetoed on an annual and even bi-annual basis, and the appointed architects dropping out altogether. This January, a letter from the Council For British Archaeology stated that only two out of the latest batch of ideas developed as part of a public consultation were in any way feasible, and suggested that new facilities should be built on the site at Airman’s Corner.

This site is further from the stones than the initially-proposed Fargo site, and could appease some heritage organisations. Could there be light at the end of the rejected tunnel after all?