King Arthur's Real Round Table Revealed
King Arthur’s Round Table wasn’t just the romantic meeting place of Arthur’s warriors but a massive building on the edge of a huge Roman city. What's more, it was a powerful symbol of Roman authority that survived for some 600 years after the Romans left Britain. (Skip to the Video)
That’s the bold conclusion made by archaeologists in a new documentary that shows how the monumental Roman structure was transformed from an amphitheatre into a fortified stronghold.
King Arthur’s Round Table Revealed explores this and other mysteries surrounding by the iconic British hero King Arthur.
The documentary is an exploration of what archaeology today is revealing about King Arthur’s world. It follows life in Dark Age Britain after the fall of Rome resulted in chaos, anarchy and inter-ethnic strife. It all led to the rise or warlords – including King Arthur, who led the resistance against the Saxon insurgency.
The refortification of Roman sites, the vital strategic importance of the road system and the use of Christianity as a rallying point against the pagan Saxons are all studied. There are some excellent reconstructions of Arthurian warfare by Comitatus and Regia Anglorum; scientific analysis of one of the skeletons from a Dark Age mass grave outside Chester; and high quality replicas showing the distinctive military fittings which characterised the armies of the British warlords.
Chester – King Arthur's Stronghold
The programme uses Dark Age texts to track down traces of Arthur on the ground, while at the same time taking in archaeological evidence relating to key sites such as Hadrian’s Wall, Silchester and, crucially, Chester. Here, finds in the huge amphitheatre confirm the identity of Chester with the ‘City of the Legion’, site of two of the first Christian martyrdoms in Britain and one of King Arthur’s famous 12 battles.
Christopher Gidlow, author of Revealing King Arthur, is one of the programme's consultants. He describes the documentary as “convincing and powerfully told”.
“You won’t have seen a programme like this,” he says. “The scholarship is cutting edge and the list of contributors is a who’s who of the most respected archaeologists working in the field. The part which sees the forensic scientist Malin Holst examine the body of a slain Saxon warrior is incredible. Tony Wilmott of English Heritage conveys a real sense of the awe he and his team felt confronted with the evidence of the Christian martyr from the Chester Amphitheatre. There is also some great CGI and the reconstructions of the Romanised British army fighting the invaders are the best I’ve seen. King Arthur’s Round Table Revealed will have you thinking ‘this has got to be right’.”
One of the programme's other contributors, Stuart Laycock – himself an expert on post-Roman rule in Britain – has described Gidlow as “the most credible proponent of a historical Arthur”.
“I take this as meaning that I keep up to date with modern scholarship and that I don’t have a blinkered attachment to proving that King Arthur shared my postcode or that some other shadowy Dark Age character is hiding behind the Arthur mask,” says Gidlow.
HD Video: Legend of King Arthur's Round Table based on Roman Amphitheatre
You can read an extract from Gidlow's Revealing King Arthur on the Tintagel Stone in Cornwall – here on HK. And also trace his Top 10 Archaeological Clues to the Real King Arthur.
(Click here for a transcription)
King Arthur’s Round Table Revealed (video trailer) will air in the UK on the HISTORY channel (Sky Channel 529 and Sky Channel 545) from Monday, July 19 to Sunday, July 25, 8pm-11pm.
Read 4 comments, or leave your own
Latest
Get Real About Advertising Fakes ASA Tells Semmel Concerts King Tut Tour- Unique Iron Age Hoard goes on display at Ipswich Museum
- Missing the revolution but making the party!
- Royal Artefacts - Including King Tut's Golden Trumpet - Returned to Egyptian Museum Cairo
SCA releases full list of treasures missing from the Cairo Museum- Petrie Museum celebrates the extraordinary life of Amelia Edwards
- New Face for 5,300-year-old Otzi the Iceman
- New Clues to Welsh Origins of Stonehenge Bluestones
- Read latest articles, blogs & reviews
Most Popular
- Stonehenge Apocalypse - British megaliths to star in action disaster film
- Jobs for Witches at Wookey Hole Caves
- Digital Digging - Virtual Reconstructions of Avebury's Sanctuary and the Durrington Walls using Google Earth
- AWiL Video Series: Defending London - Richborough, Maunsell Seaforts, Thames Barrier & Tower of London
History Library
HK Editor's Picks
Latest Comments
Focus on
King Tut –
Stonehenge
Terracotta Warriors
Pyramids –
Archaeology
Britain –
China –
Egypt
Greece –
Rome
Heritage Key Words
ancient london, british museum, roman, art, zahi hawass, london, ancient egypt, religion, burial, valley of the kings
Next major 'ancient' exhibition in London:
Journey Through the Afterlife: The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead
at the British Museum
November 2010 - March 2011
(learn more)






videos
Comments
Perhaps now the scandal of Chester's treatment of its amphitheatre site will be exposed. Only half of it has ever been excavated, despite the fact that a now derelict building stands boarded up on the other half. Visitors to Chester are appalled at the treatment meted out to the site over the years, including its recent bland makeover. One of the potentially finest Romano British sites in the country lies under the other half. This is the spur needed to excavate the whole area.
totally agree Richard
whats more important a derelict grade 2 listed building that caught fire years ago and has been empty since or unearthing the rest of the ampitheatre and whatever artifacts are still hidden
I have just watched the documentary screened on Monday (which I recorded) I waited with bated breath for amazing discoveries. The documentary was shallow, the "facts" and sweeping generalisations had no evidence. I hope there was more evidence than that broadcast, but I was left with an overwhelming urge to throw an archeological trowel at the screen. Why was the skeleton identified as Saxon (or Angle or Jute)? Was any analysis done? Were the "Angl-saxon" cemetaries studied? How many years were they in use? What was the age/gender distribution? Were the remains from immigrants or natives who might have adopted a new fashion? Why was it assumed that a lot of military buckles was evidence of a battle? Were they all the same age? Were they all in one place or scattered in graves? Was it possible that they were from retired legioaries who were possibly awarded land in border areas? this program was on a par with the old documentary "Chariots of the Gods " and with as much academic rigour.
Nice post.Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful!I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post thanks.
tannlegekontor bodø