Queen Mutnodjmet: Another Branch in Tutankhamun's Genetic Line Found (and Lost)?
Dr. Zahi Hawass has a lot of irons in the fire, not the least of which is the unraveling of the DNA of the Eighteenth Dynasty. He is currently awaiting peer confirmation on a second lab test that has confirmed that one of the fetuses recovered from Tutankhamun’s tomb by Howard Carter in 1922 is indeed Tut’s daughter. In the meanwhile, the inventor of the 24 hour workday has been busy at Horemheb’s tomb at Saqqara.
Horemheb, the last king of the celebrated Eighteenth Dynasty, was originally a powerful general who managed military affairs under Kings Tutankhamun and Ay prior to ascending to the throne himself. While still a court official he prepared for the afterlife by constructing a tomb among the nobles at Saqqara. But after becoming king he had a second tomb built for himself in the Valley of the Kings at Thebes, while the Saqqara tomb was used for his first and second wives, Amenia and Mutnodjmet, respectively.
This week, in Al-Ahram Weekly (“Dig Days: The Search for Queen Mutnodjmet”), Dr. Hawass relates that identification of the second of these queens, Mutnodjmet, may take us further into the lineage of Tutankhamen’s family, with a little help from Queen Nefertiti. He points out that some Egyptologists think that in addition to Nefertiti, Pharaoh Ay had another daughter named Mutbernet, and that Mutbernet and Mutnodjmet may be the same person.
Archaeologist Geoffrey Martin, who is currently in charge of restoration efforts at Horemheb’s Saqqara tomb, believes that the mummies remains of a woman and a fetus discovered in the shaft outside the rooms of the tomb were dragged there by looters from the burial chamber below. Based on burial apparatus belonging to the queen, including an alabaster funerary vase inscribed with the names and titles of Mutnodjmet, Martin thinks it is likely that the remains are those of the queen.
The remains were subsequently determined by archaeologist and anthropologist Eugen Strouhal, who specializes in African History in general, and Egyptian anthropology in particular, to be those of a 40-45 year old woman who died in childbirth. Given the age of the woman, her proximity to the burial chamber, and the funerary items associated with Mutnodjmet, Strouhal concurred that the remains were very likely those of the second queen of Horemheb.
Name that Body
Once Dr. Hawass receives final confirmation of Tutankhamun’s paternity regarding the fetus that was found in his tomb, he will then hopefully be able to identify Tut’s wife, Ankhesenamun. Once that is done, he can then identify her mother, Nefertiti, from amongst the unidentified remains. With Nefertiti’s remains positively identified, she can then be cross-compared to the remains of Mutnodjmet. If these remains prove to be the sister of Queen Nefertiti, then we will know for certain that Mutnodjmet and Mutbernet was the same person, which will then open a new genetic branch in the Eighteenth Dynasty for exploration.
There is only one problem: somebody has apparently misplaced the queen. When Dr. Hawass was ready to begin examining the bones of Queen Mutnodjmet he naturally asked Geoffrey Martin about her whereabouts. “When I questioned him about the location of the queen's skeletal remains, however, he could not give me an answer.” Eugen Strouhal also attempted to relocate the queen’s remains, to no avail. Dr. Hawass himself finally paid the Saqqara tomb a visit, but the queen remains AWOL.
“I have high hopes that we will be successful in our search to locate the bones of Queen Mutnodjmet,” Dr. Hawass states.
Until then Dr. Hawass has other lines, genetic and otherwise, to pursue. Stay tuned to Heritage Key for updates!
Image by Archivist Llewellyn (DNA double helix added by Keith Payne). All rights reserved.
Read 3 comments, or leave your own
Latest
Get Real About Advertising Fakes ASA Tells Semmel Concerts King Tut Tour- Unique Iron Age Hoard goes on display at Ipswich Museum
- Missing the revolution but making the party!
- Royal Artefacts - Including King Tut's Golden Trumpet - Returned to Egyptian Museum Cairo
SCA releases full list of treasures missing from the Cairo Museum- Petrie Museum celebrates the extraordinary life of Amelia Edwards
- New Face for 5,300-year-old Otzi the Iceman
- New Clues to Welsh Origins of Stonehenge Bluestones
- Read latest articles, blogs & reviews
Most Popular
- Stonehenge Apocalypse - British megaliths to star in action disaster film
- Jobs for Witches at Wookey Hole Caves
- Digital Digging - Virtual Reconstructions of Avebury's Sanctuary and the Durrington Walls using Google Earth
- AWiL Video Series: Defending London - Richborough, Maunsell Seaforts, Thames Barrier & Tower of London
History Library
HK Editor's Picks
Latest Comments
Focus on
King Tut –
Stonehenge
Terracotta Warriors
Pyramids –
Archaeology
Britain –
China –
Egypt
Greece –
Rome
Heritage Key Words
ancient london, british museum, roman, art, zahi hawass, london, ancient egypt, religion, burial, valley of the kings
Next major 'ancient' exhibition in London:
Journey Through the Afterlife: The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead
at the British Museum
November 2010 - March 2011
(learn more)







videos
Comments
I seem to remember the 'comparison' results for King Tut's DNA tests were going to be done somewhere 'Septemberish'? Hope they can track down the mummy by then. But really.. how can one just _loose_ a mummy. I guess one could misplace it, but that bad that it's not possible to track it? Don't they have labels? Or Post-It notes? Maybe Queen Mutbernet is having a beauty sleep in the cellars of the Cairo Museum? In any case, we do have some (unreliable ;)) proof they are actively searching for the corpse:
;)
Lol! So, can anyone vouche for the whereabouts of the Aboutaam Brothers during the time in question..?
Which provides me with a nice segue. I am pulling together everything I can for an entry on the mask of Ka-Nefer-Nefer (question number 21). I think its interesting that the the Department of Homeland Security has quietly gotten involved. Maybe they want to know exactly where that half-a-mill' in ransom money went?
Maybe the St. Louis Art Museum has more to be concerned about than a simple art theft? You've been some naughty boys, SLAM..
Stay tuned.
Please note the correction in paragraph four above. I had mistated that the mummies of a woman believed to be Mutnodjmet and a fetus had been discovered near her tomb. That is incorrect. What was discovered were skeletal remains. The remains are not referred to as a mummy by Dr. Hawass in the originating article (“Dig Days: The Search for Queen Mutnodjmet”), nor are they referred to as a mummy anywhere else that I am aware of. This was a mistake on my behalf.
Sorry for any confusion, and thanks to Kate Phizackerley from News from the Valley of the Kings for pointing this out (Queen Mutnodjmet's Missing Mummy ).